Sıralama geçmişi

Bu hesabın postlarının Debya günlük listesine girdiği en iyi günler.

Bu hesap henüz günlük sıralamaya girmedi.

Son beğendiği postlar

Bluesky ağındaki herkese açık beğeniler.

• Michael Hendricks 🇨🇦@michaelhendricks.bsky.social22.10.2026 02:22

  I guess what I'm getting at is that if we don't make a distinction between "wrong" and "error" then we are mixing things that are essential and serious problems in one category.

  Postu göster
• Michael Hendricks 🇨🇦@michaelhendricks.bsky.social22.10.2026 02:22

  Particularly galling for things the theorizer could not possibly know. Should we just say nothing until all possible evidence is known, presumably some time near the heat death of the universe, to avoid error?

  Postu göster
• Michael Hendricks 🇨🇦@michaelhendricks.bsky.social22.10.2026 02:22

  Yeah I think many of the examples in the table are extraordinarliy bad, the definition is a little better. But a good wrong theory for available evidence cannot be considered an error, it's probably the most productive tool science has. Otherwise we conflate "progress" with "self-correcting."

  Postu göster
• Mark Rubin@markrubin.bsky.social22.10.2026 02:22

  It's tricky to define. The author has a go here...

  Postu göster
• Michael Hendricks 🇨🇦@michaelhendricks.bsky.social22.10.2026 01:42

  I think I might not understand what an "error" is? Pluto = planet is just a semantic distinction based on a 2006 definition some people made up? Likewise are incomplete theories that fit all available evidence errors when new evidence is found that requires new theorizing?

  Postu göster

Daha fazlası için üye girişi yap

Blokladığı hesaplar

Bluesky’da bloklar herkese açık kayıtlardır.

Bu hesap kimseyi bloklamıyor.