Présence dans les classements

Les meilleurs jours où les posts de ce compte sont entrés dans le top quotidien de Debya.

Ce compte n’est encore apparu dans aucun classement quotidien.

Posts aimés récemment

J’aime publics du réseau Bluesky.

• Michael Hendricks 🇨🇦@michaelhendricks.bsky.social22/10/2026 02:22

  I guess what I'm getting at is that if we don't make a distinction between "wrong" and "error" then we are mixing things that are essential and serious problems in one category.

  Voir le post
• Michael Hendricks 🇨🇦@michaelhendricks.bsky.social22/10/2026 02:22

  Particularly galling for things the theorizer could not possibly know. Should we just say nothing until all possible evidence is known, presumably some time near the heat death of the universe, to avoid error?

  Voir le post
• Michael Hendricks 🇨🇦@michaelhendricks.bsky.social22/10/2026 02:22

  Yeah I think many of the examples in the table are extraordinarliy bad, the definition is a little better. But a good wrong theory for available evidence cannot be considered an error, it's probably the most productive tool science has. Otherwise we conflate "progress" with "self-correcting."

  Voir le post
• Mark Rubin@markrubin.bsky.social22/10/2026 02:22

  It's tricky to define. The author has a go here...

  Voir le post
• Michael Hendricks 🇨🇦@michaelhendricks.bsky.social22/10/2026 01:42

  I think I might not understand what an "error" is? Pluto = planet is just a semantic distinction based on a 2006 definition some people made up? Likewise are incomplete theories that fit all available evidence errors when new evidence is found that requires new theorizing?

  Voir le post

Connectez-vous pour en voir plus

Comptes bloqués

Sur Bluesky, les blocages sont publics.

Ce compte ne bloque personne.