@robertmorphis.bsky.social did:plc:35rtye5dkqea6taizeubqboy
Bei Bluesky seit
- Follower
- 2
- Folgt
- 2
- Posts
- 7
- Tage in Ranglisten
- 0
Zusammenfassung
(@robertmorphis.bsky.social) ist seit 3 Februar 2026 auf Bluesky. Das Konto hat 2 Follower, folgt 2 Konten und hat 7 Posts veröffentlicht.
Ranglisten-Platzierungen
Die besten Tage, an denen Posts dieses Kontos in Debyas Tagesliste kamen.
Dieses Konto war noch in keiner Tagesrangliste.
Zuletzt gelikte Posts
Öffentliche Likes aus dem Bluesky-Netzwerk.
I guess what I'm getting at is that if we don't make a distinction between "wrong" and "error" then we are mixing things that are essential and serious problems in one category.
Post anzeigenParticularly galling for things the theorizer could not possibly know. Should we just say nothing until all possible evidence is known, presumably some time near the heat death of the universe, to avoid error?
Post anzeigenYeah I think many of the examples in the table are extraordinarliy bad, the definition is a little better. But a good wrong theory for available evidence cannot be considered an error, it's probably the most productive tool science has. Otherwise we conflate "progress" with "self-correcting."
Post anzeigenIt's tricky to define. The author has a go here...
Post anzeigenI think I might not understand what an "error" is? Pluto = planet is just a semantic distinction based on a 2006 definition some people made up? Likewise are incomplete theories that fit all available evidence errors when new evidence is found that requires new theorizing?
Post anzeigen
Blockierte Konten
Blockierungen sind auf Bluesky öffentlich.
Dieses Konto blockiert niemanden.