@robertmorphis.bsky.social did:plc:35rtye5dkqea6taizeubqboy
No Bluesky desde
- Seguidores
- 2
- Seguindo
- 2
- Posts
- 7
- Dias nos rankings
- 0
Resumo
(@robertmorphis.bsky.social) é um usuário do Bluesky desde 3 fevereiro 2026. Tem 2 seguidores, segue 2 contas e publicou 7 posts.
Aparições nos rankings
Os melhores dias em que posts desta conta entraram na lista diária do Debya.
Esta conta ainda não apareceu em um ranking diário.
Posts curtidos recentemente
Curtidas públicas da rede Bluesky.
I guess what I'm getting at is that if we don't make a distinction between "wrong" and "error" then we are mixing things that are essential and serious problems in one category.
Ver postParticularly galling for things the theorizer could not possibly know. Should we just say nothing until all possible evidence is known, presumably some time near the heat death of the universe, to avoid error?
Ver postYeah I think many of the examples in the table are extraordinarliy bad, the definition is a little better. But a good wrong theory for available evidence cannot be considered an error, it's probably the most productive tool science has. Otherwise we conflate "progress" with "self-correcting."
Ver postIt's tricky to define. The author has a go here...
Ver postI think I might not understand what an "error" is? Pluto = planet is just a semantic distinction based on a 2006 definition some people made up? Likewise are incomplete theories that fit all available evidence errors when new evidence is found that requires new theorizing?
Ver post
Contas que bloqueia
No Bluesky, bloqueios são registros públicos.
Esta conta não bloqueia ninguém.