Apariciones en rankings

Los mejores días en que los posts de esta cuenta entraron en la lista diaria de Debya.

Esta cuenta aún no ha aparecido en un ranking diario.

Posts que le gustaron recientemente

Me gusta públicos de la red Bluesky.

• Michael Hendricks 🇨🇦@michaelhendricks.bsky.social22-10-2026 02:22

  I guess what I'm getting at is that if we don't make a distinction between "wrong" and "error" then we are mixing things that are essential and serious problems in one category.

  Ver post
• Michael Hendricks 🇨🇦@michaelhendricks.bsky.social22-10-2026 02:22

  Particularly galling for things the theorizer could not possibly know. Should we just say nothing until all possible evidence is known, presumably some time near the heat death of the universe, to avoid error?

  Ver post
• Michael Hendricks 🇨🇦@michaelhendricks.bsky.social22-10-2026 02:22

  Yeah I think many of the examples in the table are extraordinarliy bad, the definition is a little better. But a good wrong theory for available evidence cannot be considered an error, it's probably the most productive tool science has. Otherwise we conflate "progress" with "self-correcting."

  Ver post
• Mark Rubin@markrubin.bsky.social22-10-2026 02:22

  It's tricky to define. The author has a go here...

  Ver post
• Michael Hendricks 🇨🇦@michaelhendricks.bsky.social22-10-2026 01:42

  I think I might not understand what an "error" is? Pluto = planet is just a semantic distinction based on a 2006 definition some people made up? Likewise are incomplete theories that fit all available evidence errors when new evidence is found that requires new theorizing?

  Ver post

Inicia sesión para ver más

Cuentas que bloquea

En Bluesky los bloqueos son registros públicos.

Esta cuenta no bloquea a nadie.