Brad Plumer
@bradplumer.bsky.social did:plc:xhrtlzravw7teluu2dpph5xk
Reporter, NYT Climate. email: [email protected] signal: bradplumer.54
No Bluesky desde
- Seguidores
- 12.871
- Seguindo
- 1.020
- Posts
- 55
- Dias nos rankings
- 0
Resumo
Brad Plumer (@bradplumer.bsky.social) é um usuário do Bluesky desde 2 outubro 2023. Tem 12.871 seguidores, segue 1.020 contas e publicou 55 posts.
Aparições nos rankings
Os melhores dias em que posts desta conta entraram na lista diária do Debya.
Esta conta ainda não apareceu em um ranking diário.
Posts curtidos recentemente
Curtidas públicas da rede Bluesky.
Tagging in #EnergySky, what do yall think? @robgramlichdc.bsky.social @davidmindham.bsky.social @energylawjeff.bsky.social @christywalshdc.bsky.social
Ver postIf transmission plans change, IX gets messed up. The benefits of CPP rely on transmission plans sticking. Not that the status quo is much better...but we should consider whether another 2y pause in generation IX queues for a new rule is a good idea when a ton of new Tx cost needs to get allocated
Ver postI like many others think CPP is good in theory, but it's still being proven #EmergySky Proactive transmission + generation planning has problems. CAISO just saw a canceled Tx line nix 7.5 GW of deliverability in its queue--after directing folks to request IX specifically where capacity was expected
Ver postThe permitting bill requires FERC to make a new rule directing all RTOs to copy SPP's Consolidated Planning Process. SPP just announced its CPP will require $140K-$260K/MW for new generator IX at planned locations. And that's assuming planned Tx is built Not sure this should be in the bill
Ver postthanks @bradplumer.bsky.social
Ver post
Contas que bloqueia
No Bluesky, bloqueios são registros públicos.
