Brad Plumer
@bradplumer.bsky.social did:plc:xhrtlzravw7teluu2dpph5xk
Reporter, NYT Climate. email: [email protected] signal: bradplumer.54
Bei Bluesky seit
- Follower
- 12.871
- Folgt
- 1.020
- Posts
- 55
- Tage in Ranglisten
- 0
Zusammenfassung
Brad Plumer (@bradplumer.bsky.social) ist seit 2 Oktober 2023 auf Bluesky. Das Konto hat 12.871 Follower, folgt 1.020 Konten und hat 55 Posts veröffentlicht.
Ranglisten-Platzierungen
Die besten Tage, an denen Posts dieses Kontos in Debyas Tagesliste kamen.
Dieses Konto war noch in keiner Tagesrangliste.
Zuletzt gelikte Posts
Öffentliche Likes aus dem Bluesky-Netzwerk.
Tagging in #EnergySky, what do yall think? @robgramlichdc.bsky.social @davidmindham.bsky.social @energylawjeff.bsky.social @christywalshdc.bsky.social
Post anzeigenIf transmission plans change, IX gets messed up. The benefits of CPP rely on transmission plans sticking. Not that the status quo is much better...but we should consider whether another 2y pause in generation IX queues for a new rule is a good idea when a ton of new Tx cost needs to get allocated
Post anzeigenI like many others think CPP is good in theory, but it's still being proven #EmergySky Proactive transmission + generation planning has problems. CAISO just saw a canceled Tx line nix 7.5 GW of deliverability in its queue--after directing folks to request IX specifically where capacity was expected
Post anzeigenThe permitting bill requires FERC to make a new rule directing all RTOs to copy SPP's Consolidated Planning Process. SPP just announced its CPP will require $140K-$260K/MW for new generator IX at planned locations. And that's assuming planned Tx is built Not sure this should be in the bill
Post anzeigenthanks @bradplumer.bsky.social
Post anzeigen
Blockierte Konten
Blockierungen sind auf Bluesky öffentlich.
