Brad Plumer
@bradplumer.bsky.social did:plc:xhrtlzravw7teluu2dpph5xk
Reporter, NYT Climate. email: [email protected] signal: bradplumer.54
En Bluesky desde el
- Seguidores
- 12.872
- Siguiendo
- 1.020
- Posts
- 55
- Días en rankings
- 0
Resumen
Brad Plumer (@bradplumer.bsky.social) es un usuario de Bluesky que se unió el 2 octubre 2023. Tiene 12.872 seguidores, sigue a 1.020 cuentas y ha publicado 55 posts.
Apariciones en rankings
Los mejores días en que los posts de esta cuenta entraron en la lista diaria de Debya.
Esta cuenta aún no ha aparecido en un ranking diario.
Posts que le gustaron recientemente
Me gusta públicos de la red Bluesky.
Tagging in #EnergySky, what do yall think? @robgramlichdc.bsky.social @davidmindham.bsky.social @energylawjeff.bsky.social @christywalshdc.bsky.social
Ver postIf transmission plans change, IX gets messed up. The benefits of CPP rely on transmission plans sticking. Not that the status quo is much better...but we should consider whether another 2y pause in generation IX queues for a new rule is a good idea when a ton of new Tx cost needs to get allocated
Ver postI like many others think CPP is good in theory, but it's still being proven #EmergySky Proactive transmission + generation planning has problems. CAISO just saw a canceled Tx line nix 7.5 GW of deliverability in its queue--after directing folks to request IX specifically where capacity was expected
Ver postThe permitting bill requires FERC to make a new rule directing all RTOs to copy SPP's Consolidated Planning Process. SPP just announced its CPP will require $140K-$260K/MW for new generator IX at planned locations. And that's assuming planned Tx is built Not sure this should be in the bill
Ver postthanks @bradplumer.bsky.social
Ver post
Cuentas que bloquea
En Bluesky los bloqueos son registros públicos.
