I don't care what tools someone uses to make the measurement, do the analysis and make a new discovery, but I care very much if they don't understand how they got the results with them.

Show Post

I think that there's also a practical note. As an ECR, I'm already extremely overburdened with responsibilities and reviewing work - reviewing getting, say, an order of magnitude worse would be impossible to keep up with. Out of pure practicality I don't think it's possible to allow these papers

Show Post

I mean, when it's written by ai, what's the point? A paper communicates ideas from a person to another person. Anyone can prompt an ai model and get a similarly shaped paper to the ones posted yesterday; the information isn't worth anyone's time when it's not written by a person.

Show Post

The most practical solution would be some kind of online, electronic portal that non-astronomers can post possible discoveries to, be they an exoplanet or similar. But we'll drown if they submit full-length AI generated papers for every new planet

Show Post

Good night from every unsent sunflower in my camera roll

Show Post