Nemo Literam
@nemoliteram.bsky.social did:plc:y2lc57m5fyd2b7h33d5ee7i2
24 | Historian | Ultravisionary Thought Leader | Radical Moralist | Raskolnikov Complex case study | My views are solely my own.
Bluesky’a katılma tarihi:
- Takipçi
- 123
- Takip edilen
- 70
- Post
- 79
- Sıralamaya girdiği gün
- 0
Özet
Nemo Literam (@nemoliteram.bsky.social), 27 Aralık 2024 tarihinde katılan bir Bluesky kullanıcısı. 123 takipçisi var, 70 hesabı takip ediyor ve 79 post paylaştı.
Sıralama geçmişi
Bu hesabın postlarının Debya günlük listesine girdiği en iyi günler.
Bu hesap henüz günlük sıralamaya girmedi.
Son beğendiği postlar
Bluesky ağındaki herkese açık beğeniler.
(Related to this is the difficulty basically every GSG or 4X I've ever played has in simulating real frontiers that require regular 'frontier maintenance' and represent a continual drain on resources to maintain. They have borders (state-on-state) but not frontiers)
Postu gösterAnyway, I wish the forces of fragmentation in basically all strategy games were stronger. Most games should not feel like there is a global progression towards state consolidation, so much as a continuous push and pull, fragmentation and consolidation in waves.
Postu gösterFor some eras (EU5 and Vicky3, for instance) that makes sense, but there are a lot of other periods where state fragmentation was really common! The number of sovereign states exploded from 1900 to 2000, from ~50 to ~200!
Postu gösterInstead the relentless trend in grand strategy games (and 4X games) is state consolidation: relentlessly larger states that rarely if ever meaningfully fragment. Just bigger and bigger. That's not exactly the historical pattern!
Postu göster
Blokladığı hesaplar
Bluesky’da bloklar herkese açık kayıtlardır.
Bu hesap kimseyi bloklamıyor.