İçeriğe geç

@yukitaka-oiishi.bsky.social did:plc:m77gd3rf7n25awpuiabridc6

Bluesky’a katılma tarihi:

Takipçi
66
Takip edilen
373
Post
0
Sıralamaya girdiği gün
0

Özet

(@yukitaka-oiishi.bsky.social), 23 Ocak 2025 tarihinde katılan bir Bluesky kullanıcısı. 66 takipçisi var, 373 hesabı takip ediyor ve 0 post paylaştı.

Sıralama geçmişi

Bu hesabın postlarının Debya günlük listesine girdiği en iyi günler.

Bu hesap henüz günlük sıralamaya girmedi.

Son beğendiği postlar

Bluesky ağındaki herkese açık beğeniler.

  • David Scales@tnfalpha.bsky.social

    Yes. Where is the understanding of social networks, in person discussions. They describe communication campaigns but we don’t actually get a (qual or quant) understanding of someone’s information ecosystem. Exposure /= impact. That’s not how people make meaning out of things.

    Postu göster
  • Tom@alttag.bsky.social

    And we come full circle: you’re asking for a different study than what they did. Science happens by increments. First we demonstrate a thing in one context, then expand contexts to see if it holds.

    Postu göster
  • Alexander Kustov@akoustov.bsky.social

    This anonymous editorial from the most prestigious journal clearly implies that the scrutiny and criticism of Arday were not warranted (since he was cleared) and that his data fabrications were personal aspects. If you don't think it's concerning at all, I don't think we need to engage further.

    Postu göster
  • Alexander Kustov@akoustov.bsky.social

    Absolutely shameful, and arguably even worse than when Nature endorsed Biden in 2020—misrepresenting publicly known facts and openly protecting fraud, all in the name of clearly ideological goals. At the very least, Nature owes its readers a correction.

    Postu göster
  • Kapalı hesap

    İçerik görüntülenemiyor

    Postu göster

Daha fazlası için üye girişi yap

Blokladığı hesaplar

Bluesky’da bloklar herkese açık kayıtlardır.