@yukitaka-oiishi.bsky.social did:plc:m77gd3rf7n25awpuiabridc6
Bluesky’a katılma tarihi:
- Takipçi
- 66
- Takip edilen
- 373
- Post
- 0
- Sıralamaya girdiği gün
- 0
Özet
(@yukitaka-oiishi.bsky.social), 23 Ocak 2025 tarihinde katılan bir Bluesky kullanıcısı. 66 takipçisi var, 373 hesabı takip ediyor ve 0 post paylaştı.
Sıralama geçmişi
Bu hesabın postlarının Debya günlük listesine girdiği en iyi günler.
Bu hesap henüz günlük sıralamaya girmedi.
Son beğendiği postlar
Bluesky ağındaki herkese açık beğeniler.
Yes. Where is the understanding of social networks, in person discussions. They describe communication campaigns but we don’t actually get a (qual or quant) understanding of someone’s information ecosystem. Exposure /= impact. That’s not how people make meaning out of things.
Postu gösterAnd we come full circle: you’re asking for a different study than what they did. Science happens by increments. First we demonstrate a thing in one context, then expand contexts to see if it holds.
Postu gösterThis anonymous editorial from the most prestigious journal clearly implies that the scrutiny and criticism of Arday were not warranted (since he was cleared) and that his data fabrications were personal aspects. If you don't think it's concerning at all, I don't think we need to engage further.
Postu gösterAbsolutely shameful, and arguably even worse than when Nature endorsed Biden in 2020—misrepresenting publicly known facts and openly protecting fraud, all in the name of clearly ideological goals. At the very least, Nature owes its readers a correction.
Postu gösterİçerik görüntülenemiyor
Postu göster
Blokladığı hesaplar
Bluesky’da bloklar herkese açık kayıtlardır.