Yes. Where is the understanding of social networks, in person discussions. They describe communication campaigns but we don’t actually get a (qual or quant) understanding of someone’s information ecosystem. Exposure /= impact. That’s not how people make meaning out of things.

Show Post

And we come full circle: you’re asking for a different study than what they did. Science happens by increments. First we demonstrate a thing in one context, then expand contexts to see if it holds.

Show Post

This anonymous editorial from the most prestigious journal clearly implies that the scrutiny and criticism of Arday were not warranted (since he was cleared) and that his data fabrications were personal aspects. If you don't think it's concerning at all, I don't think we need to engage further.

Show Post

Absolutely shameful, and arguably even worse than when Nature endorsed Biden in 2020—misrepresenting publicly known facts and openly protecting fraud, all in the name of clearly ideological goals. At the very least, Nature owes its readers a correction.

Show Post

Kapalı içerik

Show Post