İçeriğe geç

Daphne O. Martschenko, PhD

@daphmarts.bsky.social did:plc:cqiqgpwzvxee6pzwqhrst6bw

🧬Assistant Professor of Biomedical Ethics @ Stanford 📕Author of WHAT WE INHERIT (2026) 🐈 Mom to Sassy & 🙋🏾‍♀️ Mom to Théa 🧘🏾‍♀️Yogi in training daphnemartschenko.com

Bluesky’a katılma tarihi:

Takipçi
924
Takip edilen
196
Post
73
Sıralamaya girdiği gün
0

Özet

Daphne O. Martschenko, PhD (@daphmarts.bsky.social), 25 Temmuz 2023 tarihinde katılan bir Bluesky kullanıcısı. 924 takipçisi var, 196 hesabı takip ediyor ve 73 post paylaştı.

Sıralama geçmişi

Bu hesabın postlarının Debya günlük listesine girdiği en iyi günler.

Bu hesap henüz günlük sıralamaya girmedi.

Son beğendiği postlar

Bluesky ağındaki herkese açık beğeniler.

  • Roshni Patel@roshnipatel.bsky.social

    Would love to hear any feedback, and for more reading on the impact of the 2023 NASEM report, check out our preprint surveying early-career researchers, led by @jayatirsharma.bsky.social and @christacaggiano.bsky.social, from earlier this year: www.biorxiv.org/content/10.6...

    Postu göster
  • Roshni Patel@roshnipatel.bsky.social

    But, this also illustrates the importance of bottom-up change: decades of work by individual researchers across the field have systematically improved our use of population descriptors in human genetics and genomics. We need to continue to invest in these efforts -- ethics and rigor are intertwined!

    Postu göster
  • Roshni Patel@roshnipatel.bsky.social

    To be clear, this is good news! Over the last 20 years, human genetics GWAS have consistently followed all 2023 NASEM guidelines more thoroughly. (One notable exception is community engagement, which remains poor.)

    Postu göster
  • Roshni Patel@roshnipatel.bsky.social

    Surprisingly, we also find that improvements in the use of population descriptors far predate the publication of the NASEM report -- suggesting these changes are not the result of any single intervention but rather the cumulative effects of tiny shifts in research practices and community norms

    Postu göster
  • Roshni Patel@roshnipatel.bsky.social

    Here, we use the recommendations of the NASEM report as a rubric to evaluate the use of pop descriptors. We find that GWAS on datasets from outside the US or UK, or on non-European populations, tend to score better, suggesting these GWAS systematically use pop descriptors more accurately + ethically

    Postu göster

Daha fazlası için üye girişi yap

Blokladığı hesaplar

Bluesky’da bloklar herkese açık kayıtlardır.

Bu hesap kimseyi bloklamıyor.