Daphne O. Martschenko, PhD
@daphmarts.bsky.social did:plc:cqiqgpwzvxee6pzwqhrst6bw
🧬Assistant Professor of Biomedical Ethics @ Stanford 📕Author of WHAT WE INHERIT (2026) 🐈 Mom to Sassy & 🙋🏾♀️ Mom to Théa 🧘🏾♀️Yogi in training daphnemartschenko.com
En Bluesky desde el
- Seguidores
- 924
- Siguiendo
- 196
- Posts
- 73
- Días en rankings
- 0
Resumen
Daphne O. Martschenko, PhD (@daphmarts.bsky.social) es un usuario de Bluesky que se unió el 25 julio 2023. Tiene 924 seguidores, sigue a 196 cuentas y ha publicado 73 posts.
Apariciones en rankings
Los mejores días en que los posts de esta cuenta entraron en la lista diaria de Debya.
Esta cuenta aún no ha aparecido en un ranking diario.
Posts que le gustaron recientemente
Me gusta públicos de la red Bluesky.
Would love to hear any feedback, and for more reading on the impact of the 2023 NASEM report, check out our preprint surveying early-career researchers, led by @jayatirsharma.bsky.social and @christacaggiano.bsky.social, from earlier this year: www.biorxiv.org/content/10.6...
Ver postBut, this also illustrates the importance of bottom-up change: decades of work by individual researchers across the field have systematically improved our use of population descriptors in human genetics and genomics. We need to continue to invest in these efforts -- ethics and rigor are intertwined!
Ver postTo be clear, this is good news! Over the last 20 years, human genetics GWAS have consistently followed all 2023 NASEM guidelines more thoroughly. (One notable exception is community engagement, which remains poor.)
Ver postSurprisingly, we also find that improvements in the use of population descriptors far predate the publication of the NASEM report -- suggesting these changes are not the result of any single intervention but rather the cumulative effects of tiny shifts in research practices and community norms
Ver postHere, we use the recommendations of the NASEM report as a rubric to evaluate the use of pop descriptors. We find that GWAS on datasets from outside the US or UK, or on non-European populations, tend to score better, suggesting these GWAS systematically use pop descriptors more accurately + ethically
Ver post
Cuentas que bloquea
En Bluesky los bloqueos son registros públicos.
Esta cuenta no bloquea a nadie.