Daphne O. Martschenko, PhD
@daphmarts.bsky.social did:plc:cqiqgpwzvxee6pzwqhrst6bw
🧬Assistant Professor of Biomedical Ethics @ Stanford 📕Author of WHAT WE INHERIT (2026) 🐈 Mom to Sassy & 🙋🏾♀️ Mom to Théa 🧘🏾♀️Yogi in training daphnemartschenko.com
No Bluesky desde
- Seguidores
- 924
- Seguindo
- 196
- Posts
- 73
- Dias nos rankings
- 0
Resumo
Daphne O. Martschenko, PhD (@daphmarts.bsky.social) é um usuário do Bluesky desde 25 julho 2023. Tem 924 seguidores, segue 196 contas e publicou 73 posts.
Aparições nos rankings
Os melhores dias em que posts desta conta entraram na lista diária do Debya.
Esta conta ainda não apareceu em um ranking diário.
Posts curtidos recentemente
Curtidas públicas da rede Bluesky.
Would love to hear any feedback, and for more reading on the impact of the 2023 NASEM report, check out our preprint surveying early-career researchers, led by @jayatirsharma.bsky.social and @christacaggiano.bsky.social, from earlier this year: www.biorxiv.org/content/10.6...
Ver postBut, this also illustrates the importance of bottom-up change: decades of work by individual researchers across the field have systematically improved our use of population descriptors in human genetics and genomics. We need to continue to invest in these efforts -- ethics and rigor are intertwined!
Ver postTo be clear, this is good news! Over the last 20 years, human genetics GWAS have consistently followed all 2023 NASEM guidelines more thoroughly. (One notable exception is community engagement, which remains poor.)
Ver postSurprisingly, we also find that improvements in the use of population descriptors far predate the publication of the NASEM report -- suggesting these changes are not the result of any single intervention but rather the cumulative effects of tiny shifts in research practices and community norms
Ver postHere, we use the recommendations of the NASEM report as a rubric to evaluate the use of pop descriptors. We find that GWAS on datasets from outside the US or UK, or on non-European populations, tend to score better, suggesting these GWAS systematically use pop descriptors more accurately + ethically
Ver post
Contas que bloqueia
No Bluesky, bloqueios são registros públicos.
Esta conta não bloqueia ninguém.