I saw a presentation of the underlying evidence this analysis is based on a while back & it contributed much to my growing fear that an alarmingly large share of Americanist political scientists are constitutionally (no pun intended) incapable of recognizing what's happening to their N of one.

Show Post

I really want him to make this change in USGIS so we can see what Google does lol

Show Post

BuT woN't ThE otHEr SidE tHeN dO tHAt tOo? I mean ... they're doing it NOW. But, yeah, they probably will. And? What upholds any sort of rule of law system is a POLITICAL commitment to defending it. It takes work. You don't just "create the Rule of Law" and watch it run on its own.

Show Post

At some point, schools are just going to have to stare SCOTUS in the eyes and say "you know what? no." And don't tell me this is lawless. The current SCOTUS has left the rule of law in the dust, contorting the 14A into a parody of what it means. Defying them IS standing up for the rule of law.

Show Post

i have said this before but “It is not permissible under the 14th Amendment for the state to alleviate racial inequality” is basically a version of Plessy v. Ferguson, which held that the 14th Amendment was not meant to equalize social relations. bsky.app/profile/mike...

Show Post