tavernrock14.bsky.social
👤 Joined on 17 November 2024
Followers
Following
Total Posts
@tavernrock14.bsky.socialmilkd.bsky.social
pygophiliac.bsky.social
bjlaiz.bsky.social
jd-vance-1.bsky.social
aranee.bsky.social
milliebigbobs.bsky.social
Not Found
Not Found
abp-art.bsky.social
josephlavigne.bsky.social
Not Found
freetacos.bsky.social
5eanathan.bsky.social
kirmca.bsky.social
freefood723.bsky.social
Not Found
vnes5a.bsky.social
Not Found
jumpoffjoe.bsky.social
mrrickygervais.bsky.social
itsbrittvicious.bsky.social
Not Found
redochre89.bsky.social
Not Found
tantan06.bsky.social
Oh, hey! I just want to introduce you all to my friend, Heather❤️❤️❤️
Show PostPS: I know most of these are in your piece as common replies, and I *do* believe in using the threat of explanation to get Republican support to pass *less evasive* measures. But I fear the political backlash that will result from working with republicans on incremental change.
Show Post4. Because adding is always easier than taking away (regarding term limits or senior status.) Which other alternatives can undo the damage and prevent more going forward? END/
Show Post3. I don’t think you could erode public trust in the court much further. The only place to go is up. And ethics reform with teeth will help boost trust in the court regardless of size. Move the Marshalls to the judiciary and create consequences for ethics violations. 3/
Show Post2. The more justices, the more difficult it becomes for the court to simply be a lever of power for the majority. It becomes exponentially harder to get an ideological consensus with more justices. 2/
Show Post