Perhaps of interest: bsky.app/profile/cell...

Show Post

Most systematic reviews and meta- analyses now include some assessment of study quality but these don't usually impact a review's conclusions. It's typically just some tick boxes or traffic lights and vague qualitative statements. We should instead filter out poor studies. What is wrong with us?

Show Post

Disabled experience is always more stressful than you think.

Show Post

Well, it's a break from the usual autism zoo ...

Show Post

Many papers I see: A global problem Search for modifiable "risk factors" A cohort study sorry I mean real-world data "Multivariate" regression Some associations Can't say cause Residual confounding Policy must change in ways having nothing to do with our findings More research is needed

Show Post