This took me a total of 20 seconds you absolute troglodyte 1. Overly Broad Definitions: Newsom wrote that the bill's definition of a "wearable recording device" was too broad. As written, it risked sweeping in everyday tech consumer gear beyond intended smart glasses targets.

Show Post

2. Redundancy with Current Penal Code: He noted that California law already explicitly bars individuals from recording anyone without their consent in spaces where a person has a reasonable expectation of privacy (such as locker rooms, changing areas, and medical offices).

Show Post

Are you ok??? Do you need a safe space where being simple enough to thing sitting governors running for president would be pro filming people naked is a competent position to take? Absolutely hilarious

Show Post

His argument is the bill is wording is too broad. He’s not in favor of recording people against their will in changing rooms ffs. I don’t even like the guy but come on people use a few wrinkles in your brain

Show Post

It’s not my job to help you, either. Welcome to the internet.

Show Post