I think we are also still working out if AI outputs are more like an essay (where we cite our sources by social practice) or a conversation (where we typically don't) or maybe like journalism which lands somewhere in between.

Show Post

"By “open access” to this literature ... without financial, legal, or technical barriers other than those inseparable from gaining access to the internet itself." (BOAI)

Show Post

"one can’t help but think there’s perhaps an unsubtle critique of the academic career and funding system inherent in a prolific researcher publicly stating that their own publications are both too abundant and not worth reading even for their own students" scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2026/09/23/a...

Show Post

"The author would like it to be made clear that this is not an AI-generated image, rather it is a poorly photoshopped collage of separate stock photos." Hell yeah, brother.

Show Post

A little bit about reading, a lot about how in scholarship the process should be as important as the output. Unfortunately, we were already in a world where output was king way before the AI wave came along and exacerbated all these problems. (500 papers not worth reading!!)

Show Post