Richard Sever
richardsever.bsky.social
Chief Science and Strategy Officer, openRxiv. Co-Founder, bioRxiv and medRxiv.
👤 Joined on 12 June 2023
16058
Followers
427
Following
3151
Total Posts
📜 Kullanıcı Geçmişi
- 12 Haz 2023, 18:43
🎉 Bluesky'e katıldı - İlk kullanıcı adı:
@richardsever.bsky.social - 09 Kas 2023, 01:33
🔄 Profil bilgileri güncellendi
🚫 Blokladığı Kullanıcılar
did:plc:k7pccs2efqqg7czoi2eoi75f
Not Found
did:plc:rdcdd6geovpe53l37s42f3pe
Not Found
did:plc:55yhmyucpatqmwn65jvhlcoy
Not Found
mentju.bsky.social
Nisha
ergizpogachev.bsky.social
did:plc:327uyuko7qljnebwulu5cpi2
Not Found
did:plc:fqwalnjrls2kusup4hxunkyy
Not Found
did:plc:pkeyr3zcehhcvu6nepccrhye
Not Found
nwaed.bsky.social
did:plc:mw52uc72kbexstd3gnit6qy3
Not Found
timrod12.bsky.social
did:plc:kmcfdscwe5kfrqkpqzafxde3
Not Found
did:plc:eeefxo5uwrycawt22duylof5
Not Found
Inquisitive Monkey
inquisitivemonkey.bsky.social
❤️ Beğendiği Gönderiler
I suspect the issue is they can’t reliably tell the difference between a non-existent ai-generated reference and one where an author screwed up (incorrect volume or year, mangled title) or didn’t catch an import mistake by endnote/zotero/etc, but where the underlying paper is real.
Show Post
Is manuscript review for the edification of the reviewer or for future readers? drugmonkey.wordpress.com/2026/10/20/i...
Show Post
There is a difference between an incorrect reference and a fabricated reference. Same for figures. Any of those ratpenis type figures should be enough.
Show Post
"technically correct but of no use to the research community" is an exploding category. At SocArXiv we designate these as not "engaging with the research literature." It's not about having cites, it's about having cites that actually help identify a need for this paper.
Show Post