يوسف اند الرزاق

yusufalqalami.bsky.social

29 May 2026 11:06

Indeed, your relevancy always was and largely still is dependent on being politically convenient.

Norma Rae 64

grandmaonion.bsky.social

16 January 2026 01:02

Thanks for the new word. I see both words are appropriate for explaining this mess

يوسف اند الرزاق

yusufalqalami.bsky.social

15 January 2026 14:48

Well, yes. Under any Islamic nation, they'd be executed for the lawlessness they commit. It's a great injustice against the innocent and society itself, with simple virtues of trust being stripped from families and communities. The man who kills another after promising them safety is uniquely evil.

يوسف اند الرزاق

yusufalqalami.bsky.social

15 January 2026 14:25

Not in Usūl al-Fiqh. It was always believed that crimes of Ḥirābah included acts of looting, violence and murder alongside acts of coercion and extortion. In a classical sense, you're entirely wrong. Terrorism is a very modern definition, and one that is far too narrow in my opinion.

يوسف اند الرزاق

yusufalqalami.bsky.social

15 January 2026 11:51

This is lawlessness, what you call terrorism, was always called banditry. These men are bandits, and in a better society, they would be punished as such.