cnm.bsky.social
👤 Joined on 12 June 2023
Followers
Following
Total Posts
@cnm.bsky.sociallbroom.bsky.social
Not Found
Not Found
afferentinput.bsky.social
transmetropolitanr.bsky.social
pdr1985.bsky.social
melgum14.bsky.social
jack-a-dandy.bsky.social
anarchodaoist.bsky.social
phyrexianmetamour.bsky.social
xather.bsky.social
treewarrior.bsky.social
eddedmondson.eurosky.social
onelunagoddess.bsky.social
elvery.northsky.social
tgnprofessor.bsky.social
andyking.bsky.social
carolxiao.bsky.social
varric-fan69.bsky.social
Not Found
moonlitwomyn.bsky.social
Not Found
handandler.bsky.social
teapainusa.bsky.social
fireantprincess.bsky.social
Precisely. There is no legal jeopardy for Zuckerberg or Meta to show up and take the 5th. That is very good and how it should be!
Show PostAnd importantly, yeah, Congress is different. No one disputes that, for example, Congress *could* revoke section 230 and nuke the open Internet as we know it, and investigating how tech companies are using that editorial shield is obviously within their legislative remit
Show PostHas this ever actually happened or is this a purely hypothetical/normative claim? Because hauling in tech execs to ask questions about editorial choices is something that has 100% already happened and I can't recall anyone ever attempting to fight it in the manner you're claiming
Show Postno, Mike, you did not point to a case holding that Congress' subpoena power was limited to inquiries about indisputably unprotected conduct?
Show PostOffering compelled testimony to Congress is not a punishment, what on earth are you talking about? Again: please cite a single case pertaining to this imagined restriction on Congress’s subpoena power.
Show Post