is it a first amendment editorial decision or an automated fuckup? if the latter, why would you not drag his ass in to explain it

Show Post

when a side defects without consequence you are now playing a fundamentally rigged game and the only way to fix it is to ensure defectors are punished in such a way that they learn there are consequences to all their choices

Show Post

What are you proposing he will win in court on, here. Like what's the proposed cause of action for being mad about being called to testify to congress.

Show Post

One would be good and the other would be bad because one cause is good and the other is bad. We are not in the realm of procedural justice concerns anymore, liberalism is not obligated to be neutral on the question of its own existence.

Show Post

I would allow limited exceptions for non-voting shares but they'd have to be, like, foreign investment in a major defense contractor whose primary business model is defense contracting.

Show Post