If you can understand why some Black Americans do not want to maintain names forced on their families in the US against their will, and why it would be offensive to insist they did, you can understand why some Ashkenazim are uncomfortable with names forced on their families by the Russian Empire.

Show Post

My thought, then, is as follows: if Michael Che could take the subject of men thinking of women solely as sexual objects seriously on "Saturday Night Live", why couldn't Shane Gillis?

Show Post

ADDENDUM: I'd like to add this, too; the week before Shane Gillis delivered that monologue, Michael Che, in the Weekend Update segment, did a sobering and serious commentary on abusive college men who think so little of women outside of their T's and A's.

Show Post

BRIEF COMMENT Hopefully, the Democrats will have responded by playing that Rage Against the Machine song that says "FUCK YOU! I WON'T DO WHAT YOU TELL ME!" and then having a DJ come in and saying "This song goes out to Joe 'No Labels' Manchin".

Show Post

Part of the answer to "how did we get here?" is that many major journalists—since 1998, Crawford has covered SCOTUS for PBS, ABC, and CBS—are lying bigots. Here Crawford is praising a guy who asked a dumb racist question, glitched out when asked why, then admitted he wanted a Christian theocracy.

Show Post