quietscientist.bsky.social
UKRI Future Leader's Fellow / Senior Lecturer and chief Science Do-er of the Fones lab, Exeter. Pro: Evidence-based thinking, kindness, pet rats, coffee.
👤 Joined on 21 September 2023
Followers
Following
Total Posts
@quietscientist.bsky.socialNot Found
jim1993.bsky.social
jane.meangirls.online
socialimpurity.bsky.social
Not Found
Not Found
lucidr.bsky.social
sonia-sodha.bsky.social
truthmathers.bsky.social
Not Found
patriot1977.bsky.social
Not Found
Not Found
m-tamm.bsky.social
Not Found
wakeupmurica.bsky.social
thorn-in-your-side.bsky.social
Not Found
thegodemperortrump.bsky.social
Not Found
This couldn’t be clearer. Bannon’s texts to Epstein in mid July 2018 - “overthrowing May right now” and in “London with Boris” as well as his appearance on LBC with Nigel Farage are prettying damning evidence of a cross party plot with foreign backing
Show PostYou're right, of course. But when we get epi data that shows a dose response, we *always* hear that it's more likely to be causal because dose response. And then when there's not a dose response, well, it must be a threshold effect. Causality is just always assumed. Drives me nuts.
Show PostI will admit to not knowing this precise biology well, but why would this not be plausible? Dosing efficacy ranges exist, and depending what it’s doing it’s plausible varied exposures produce sometimes paradoxical outcomes. An example of this is mirtazipine.
Show PostTamar, be a little careful at interpreting the point estimates on their own. The confidence intervals for quartile 2 are large such that I have little confidence there is any effect. The differences between q3 & q4 are unlikely to be real.
Show PostNotice how the popular media narrative has moved on, while people on the ground in Minneapolis are still struggling and crying out that things are as bad as ever. This is how fascist regimes operate — overreach, recalibration, normalization. Get louder, not quieter.
Show Post