meleki.bsky.social
👤 Joined on 04 December 2023
Followers
Following
Total Posts
@meleki.bsky.socialglyntyng.bsky.social
bigkafka.bsky.social
gently-peevish.bsky.social
johntimothyvian.bsky.social
shibbi.me
cpnstarkiller.bsky.social
katebyrne.bsky.social
bonesbrigaderipper.bsky.social
victoriamantell.bsky.social
margaretj.bsky.social
Not Found
quellist1.bsky.social
labcoatjoe.bsky.social
irmaprunesquallor.bsky.social
ianmusgrave.bsky.social
Not Found
danielelstein.bsky.social
exrevtony.bsky.social
markwindmill.bsky.social
anomander73.bsky.social
brian-robinsonbsky.bsky.social
wontsomeonethi2.bsky.social
judeet44.bsky.social
Not Found
political-economy.bsky.social
Fucked up, isn't it?
Show PostFunnily enough this bullshit firmly states: "If it is necessary to establish sex for legal purposes, a birth certificate will suffice." Get those GRCs going, as corrected birth certificate means you have changes your sex according to this guidance. Another incoherent bullshit document.
Show PostOh yes, I am talking strictly from the point of rule of law. With how burnham uses it as replacement for toiler paper, DMP would more likely take you behind the shed and shoot you as a way to resolve this conflict, and labour would praise it.
Show PostI don't think that's actually a risk. You could even openly go and state "I AM TRANS" and it does not matter, as it's the birth certificate that matters Actually it could protect you, as then you could sue them for singling you out, unlike other women/men just because they think you are trans
Show PostI do not see anything in this document that would compel or me into disclosing my GRC That birth certificate is as valid as any, and there is no steps here to challenge it, quite the opposite actually, it makes you not a trans person at all, you just... completely changed your sex Affirming almost
Show Post