No you’re so right. I think it’s intentional

Show Post

It’s the film really laying itself bare. And I’d say it was maybe brilliant but I just don’t think it’s the thing people are getting from the doc

Show Post

Nathan fielder wants to find the lies in small existential places, and to ask questions like “can we really know anybody?” This is essentially always what he wants to ask. But what happens when we don’t know people… because they stonewall us

Show Post

It’s not “how credible is the New York Times, really? Did they get that quote right?” It’s “undermining the credibility of the Times with no evidence.” I’m not sure if this is intentional but if it is, that’s pretty interesting lol

Show Post

The Nathan Fielder movie is about the inherently manipulative nature of language and documentary, but I the clearest example of this manipulation is not “do I remember these words exactly right,” it’s “did we look into how weird this power of attorney situation actually is”

Show Post