jayxwolf.bsky.social
sff writer & dev editor, book designer, author-illustrator, lapsed podcaster, sculptor, fabricator, Viable Paradise alum, online community specialist, queer as in here, they as in them, kennywood enthusiast. writes books as @mdmcd.com
👤 Joined on 22 February 2023
Followers
Following
Total Posts
@jayxwolf.bsky.socialNot Found
infoavawilliams5.bsky.social
headfallsoff.com
hootsiferhouse.bsky.social
vergotas.bsky.social
sherondasays.bsky.social
farseeing.bsky.social
Not Found
bumblescrump.bsky.social
vampycatxo.bsky.social
kindainteresting22.bsky.social
Not Found
oucheezz.bsky.social
oucheez.bsky.social
Not Found
Not Found
delulu27.bsky.social
juice-boxxx.bsky.social
Not Found
jessieblueaz.bsky.social
Not Found
katchella.bsky.social
oliverheavis1de.bsky.social
lewis1055.bsky.social
Not Found
I have NEVER had a competent pitch from anything that didn't turn out to be a human. I get emails daily that are absolute word salad. The only thing it has done is make it even more important that if you ARE human you take the time to write a proper pitch.
Show PostI get 50+ of these a week and I never used to get any. If one of these was for a legit book club but sounded like this they'd get tossed in the trash with the rest. bsky.app/profile/most...
Show PostWell if someone is sneaking competent pitches past me then this doesn't apply to them? The thread is literally about how we get endless emails of slavish creepy zombie praise for bookclubs that are almost always clearly fake describing our books in ways that make no sense.
Show PostExcept when it doesn't. You absolutely should be rejecting incompetent submissions however they are written, that's just rejecting incompetent submissions.
Show Postin fairness, if I were ever to cold-email an author and was saying I'd loved their work, I'd want to include some kind of proof that I had, in fact, read their work. However I suspect I'd be able to do better than "an LLM read the title and maybe the goodreads summary" levels
Show Post