Are we supposed to feel bad for people who just own RVs for recreational purposes and want the rest of us to provide free permanent parking for them? WTF.

Show Post

None of these people actually care about those who are living rough, their dignity, or their humanity. They care about "eyesores" and compliance. To them, anyone not in traditional housing is a Problem to be eradicated.

Show Post

He doesn't care about collateral damage because it doesnt affect him or anybody he cares about, and on the off chance it somehow did, he'd get an exception.

Show Post

Many people who are not otherwise unhoused own RVs, does he want to ban people from being able to visit Seattle in an RV? Or live here in a house and own an RV? Seems like some common sense is missing from this

Show Post

I can’t believe this is the same Dan Strauss who champions for Ballard Link Extension

Show Post