tldr the whole talk rotates around 2 fallacies: "labour productivity in US is higher"-> high prod. is not distributed across the US but mostly driven by tech hubs in CA/WA, which are not driving up US purchasing power "domestic AI will make the US win"-> no evidence domestic AI is well controlled

Show Post

I always had a weak spot for how Krugman explains things, but you gotta love a Nobel laureate that says "we tend to think of GDP as mass or energy, but it is not -- GDP is a metaphor more than a physical quantity"

Show Post

@financialtimes.com. This is not how you interview a far right party leader, even from a political economy angle. Why don't you ask about the economic /poltiical impacts of national preferences policies? Or whether she plans to rise taxes for high incomes again to lwoer public deficit?

Show Post

Teasing… (avec Lucie Bargel)

Show Post

Oyé oyé braves gens ! Avec @sciencecqfd.bsky.social on prépare une émission sur « la méthode scientifique ». Ce qu’elle est, comment elle a évolué et surtout ce qu’elle veut dire aujourd’hui. On voudrait faire une séquence avec des avis de doctorants et doctorantes ! Vous êtes chauds ?

Show Post