Joe Bak-Coleman

jbakcoleman.bsky.social

11 October 2026 21:20

✅exciting sounding finding ✅authors funded by effective altruists ✅Bad study design ✅dumped in an industry funded conference ✅news coverage as tho it’s actual unbiased good science

Benjamin Lowe

brainboyben.bsky.social

09 October 2026 14:25

A Room With a View review – this must-see adaptation is radiant and utterly romantic www.theguardian.com/stage/2026/o...

Joe Bak-Coleman

jbakcoleman.bsky.social

08 October 2026 18:25

What truly grinds my gears is that climate scientist can spend 50 years building data-grounded models and need to frame their findings to avoid being called alarmist. At the same time x-risk cranks and CEOs can just pull P(doom) > 10% out of their ass and be taken seriously.

Berna Devezer

devezer.bsky.social

06 October 2026 14:14

I don't understand this. 52 years later, why try and replicate the original? It's obviously not going to be the same study. The world has changed; cars, traffic, and people have changed. If one is interested in false memory, why not design the best study you can? What can you conclude meaningfully?

Rafael M Batista

rafmbatista.bsky.social

06 October 2026 14:14

This whole thread rocks! Clear and important perspective when reading about (and considering doing) replications in psychology