Richard Huskey
@richardhuskey.bsky.social did:plc:yzlqpiw66h7oppkphl3ckosl
Associate Professor, UC Davis. PI, Cognitive Communication Science Lab. Associate Editor, Journal of Communication. Ski bum at heart. https://cogcommscience.com/
Bluesky’a katılma tarihi:
- Takipçi
- 2.285
- Takip edilen
- 1.785
- Post
- 319
- Sıralamaya girdiği gün
- 0
Özet
Richard Huskey (@richardhuskey.bsky.social), 12 Eylül 2023 tarihinde katılan bir Bluesky kullanıcısı. 2.285 takipçisi var, 1.785 hesabı takip ediyor ve 319 post paylaştı.
Sıralama geçmişi
Bu hesabın postlarının Debya günlük listesine girdiği en iyi günler.
Bu hesap henüz günlük sıralamaya girmedi.
Son beğendiği postlar
Bluesky ağındaki herkese açık beğeniler.
It’d be neat to have a US senator with some understanding of complex systems and agent based modeling.
Postu gösterPlus: We review, but authors get the reviews only months later, when most have already submitted to journals.
Postu göster💯 I've had ICA reviews that fundamentally improved papers before journal submission, but that's rare. What's the expected workflow? Finish in Nov, wait to Jan for reviews, submit to a journal in Feb, present at ICA, then get journal reviews? Preprints completely changed the role of conferences.
Postu gösterYes, I'm sure. It does create some form of 'seasonality' to the research cycle but I think this should prompt consideration of what the conference is for, what presentation/discussion formats best serve that, and what submission formats also serve that. Agree - very little time for discussion.
Postu gösterI think there never was any thinking regarding an underlying or prototypical workflow … also, at the conference papers are mostly only „presented“ but not really „discussed“ (comments are explicitly not welcome). The talks are more about sharing than improving research.
Postu göster
Blokladığı hesaplar
Bluesky’da bloklar herkese açık kayıtlardır.
