İçeriğe geç

Institute of Philosophy LUH

@iphilluh.bsky.social did:plc:vikxxrwosihdrzjpd3aswfr3

News and musings from the Institute of Philosophy, Leibniz University Hannover. We do, among other things, a lot of philosophy of science!

Bluesky’a katılma tarihi:

Takipçi
1.783
Takip edilen
272
Post
104
Sıralamaya girdiği gün
0

Özet

Institute of Philosophy LUH (@iphilluh.bsky.social), 23 Ekim 2023 tarihinde katılan bir Bluesky kullanıcısı. 1.783 takipçisi var, 272 hesabı takip ediyor ve 104 post paylaştı.

Sıralama geçmişi

Bu hesabın postlarının Debya günlük listesine girdiği en iyi günler.

Bu hesap henüz günlük sıralamaya girmedi.

Son beğendiği postlar

Bluesky ağındaki herkese açık beğeniler.

  • ISiS Radboud@isis-radboud.bsky.social

    ISiS welcomes Marjolein Pijnappels as a visiting researcher! She designs arts-based interventions to enable policymakers, professionals and citizens, to explore socio-techno-ecological futures together.

    Postu göster
  • Tanja Rechnitzer@tanjarechnitzer.bsky.social

    🤩Coming soon: Students of SOCRATES 🎙️ In my seminar, M.A. Philosophy of Science students at Leibniz University Hannover interviewed fellows of #SOCRATESgroup about expertise, health & science communication. Three episodes to be published soon, excited & so proud of the students! 🎧 #PhilSci #SciComm

    Postu göster
  • MAPS Project@mapsproject.bsky.social

    2/2 that trust in science debate is taking place among philosophers in affluent Western countries & that it has been studied as a values-alignment problem. They argue that in developing countries TS stems less from concerns about science’s epistemic credibility & more from institutional failures.

    Postu göster
  • MAPS Project@mapsproject.bsky.social

    1/2 Team member Maxim Pfaffenrot gave a talk at the SOPhiA 2026 conference. Examining the COVID-19 pandemic as an episode of fast science, he shows that scientists inevitably make non-epistemic value judgements under time constraints.

    Postu göster
  • MAPS Project@mapsproject.bsky.social

    2/2 He argued for a positive role for scientist-bureaucrats as non-epistemic decision makers during fast science, advocating a separation of responsibilities between scientists and scientist-bureaucrats.

    Postu göster

Daha fazlası için üye girişi yap

Blokladığı hesaplar

Bluesky’da bloklar herkese açık kayıtlardır.