Aller au contenu

Institute of Philosophy LUH

@iphilluh.bsky.social did:plc:vikxxrwosihdrzjpd3aswfr3

News and musings from the Institute of Philosophy, Leibniz University Hannover. We do, among other things, a lot of philosophy of science!

Sur Bluesky depuis le

Abonnés
1 784
Abonnements
272
Posts
104
Jours dans les classements
0

Résumé

Institute of Philosophy LUH (@iphilluh.bsky.social) est sur Bluesky depuis le 23 octobre 2023. Le compte a 1 784 abonnés, suit 272 comptes et a publié 104 posts.

Présence dans les classements

Les meilleurs jours où les posts de ce compte sont entrés dans le top quotidien de Debya.

Ce compte n’est encore apparu dans aucun classement quotidien.

Posts aimés récemment

J’aime publics du réseau Bluesky.

  • ISiS Radboud@isis-radboud.bsky.social

    ISiS welcomes Marjolein Pijnappels as a visiting researcher! She designs arts-based interventions to enable policymakers, professionals and citizens, to explore socio-techno-ecological futures together.

    Voir le post
  • Tanja Rechnitzer@tanjarechnitzer.bsky.social

    🤩Coming soon: Students of SOCRATES 🎙️ In my seminar, M.A. Philosophy of Science students at Leibniz University Hannover interviewed fellows of #SOCRATESgroup about expertise, health & science communication. Three episodes to be published soon, excited & so proud of the students! 🎧 #PhilSci #SciComm

    Voir le post
  • MAPS Project@mapsproject.bsky.social

    2/2 that trust in science debate is taking place among philosophers in affluent Western countries & that it has been studied as a values-alignment problem. They argue that in developing countries TS stems less from concerns about science’s epistemic credibility & more from institutional failures.

    Voir le post
  • MAPS Project@mapsproject.bsky.social

    1/2 Team member Maxim Pfaffenrot gave a talk at the SOPhiA 2026 conference. Examining the COVID-19 pandemic as an episode of fast science, he shows that scientists inevitably make non-epistemic value judgements under time constraints.

    Voir le post
  • MAPS Project@mapsproject.bsky.social

    2/2 He argued for a positive role for scientist-bureaucrats as non-epistemic decision makers during fast science, advocating a separation of responsibilities between scientists and scientist-bureaucrats.

    Voir le post

Connectez-vous pour en voir plus

Comptes bloqués

Sur Bluesky, les blocages sont publics.