Ruslan Rust
@rrust.bsky.social did:plc:qpwnbjvxkm2vu2wywjvst5hr
Asst Prof at @keckmedicineusc.bsky.social with interest in the #brain, #BBB, #stemcells and what can go wrong following #stroke & #AD. 🧠 🔬 Alumni of @ethzurich.bsky.social
Bluesky’a katılma tarihi:
- Takipçi
- 374
- Takip edilen
- 676
- Post
- 79
- Sıralamaya girdiği gün
- 0
Özet
Ruslan Rust (@rrust.bsky.social), 22 Kasım 2024 tarihinde katılan bir Bluesky kullanıcısı. 374 takipçisi var, 676 hesabı takip ediyor ve 79 post paylaştı.
Sıralama geçmişi
Bu hesabın postlarının Debya günlük listesine girdiği en iyi günler.
Bu hesap henüz günlük sıralamaya girmedi.
Son beğendiği postlar
Bluesky ağındaki herkese açık beğeniler.
Sounds reasonable for publications where accuracy of method and analysis is the main issue. If accuracy is the measure of publishable scientific paper perhaps humans should be excluded from research process altogether (humans are error-prone). Rather we need to rethink what is a publication
Postu gösterI think this is very field specific and a problems is that papers are getting so large that it becomes difficult for humans to spot every mistakes. For clinical trials and large datasets it will be good to run AI as presubmission check and then let humans check the quality and novelty
Postu gösterSound interesting. But, respectfully, that’s a crazy use of a diverging colourmap.
Postu gösterIf you read nothing else this week, it should be this.
Postu gösterThis is provocative and I don't really agree, but I do think that agents can catch mistakes and errors in paper and their data that you can't. I think you should validate and reproduce papers (at least partially) with an agent and read its outputs, and consider them in your 100% human written review
Postu göster
Blokladığı hesaplar
Bluesky’da bloklar herkese açık kayıtlardır.
