Ir para o conteúdo

Ruslan Rust

@rrust.bsky.social did:plc:qpwnbjvxkm2vu2wywjvst5hr

Asst Prof at @keckmedicineusc.bsky.social with interest in the #brain, #BBB, #stemcells and what can go wrong following #stroke & #AD. 🧠 🔬 Alumni of @ethzurich.bsky.social

No Bluesky desde

Seguidores
374
Seguindo
676
Posts
79
Dias nos rankings
0

Resumo

Ruslan Rust (@rrust.bsky.social) é um usuário do Bluesky desde 22 novembro 2024. Tem 374 seguidores, segue 676 contas e publicou 79 posts.

Aparições nos rankings

Os melhores dias em que posts desta conta entraram na lista diária do Debya.

Esta conta ainda não apareceu em um ranking diário.

Posts curtidos recentemente

Curtidas públicas da rede Bluesky.

  • Klāvs Sedlenieks @klavsse.bsky.social

    Sounds reasonable for publications where accuracy of method and analysis is the main issue. If accuracy is the measure of publishable scientific paper perhaps humans should be excluded from research process altogether (humans are error-prone). Rather we need to rethink what is a publication

    Ver post
  • Hannes Maib@maiblab.bsky.social

    I think this is very field specific and a problems is that papers are getting so large that it becomes difficult for humans to spot every mistakes. For clinical trials and large datasets it will be good to run AI as presubmission check and then let humans check the quality and novelty

    Ver post
  • Harrison Ritz@hritz.bsky.social

    Sound interesting. But, respectfully, that’s a crazy use of a diverging colourmap.

    Ver post
  • Alex Crits-Christoph@acritschristoph.bsky.social

    This is provocative and I don't really agree, but I do think that agents can catch mistakes and errors in paper and their data that you can't. I think you should validate and reproduce papers (at least partially) with an agent and read its outputs, and consider them in your 100% human written review

    Ver post

Entre para ver mais

Contas que bloqueia

No Bluesky, bloqueios são registros públicos.