Borysław Paulewicz
@boryslaw.bsky.social did:plc:2ekroujmev2hrqmwzjejma3f
Intro to causal inference for psychologists: https://czasopisma.uwm.edu.pl/index.php/pp/article/view/9731/7171 A causal-theoretic definition of measurement invariance (see p. 14): + A new ordinal regression family https://osf.io/preprints/psyarxiv/e7a3x
Bluesky’a katılma tarihi:
- Takipçi
- 1.017
- Takip edilen
- 143
- Post
- 1.320
- Sıralamaya girdiği gün
- 0
Özet
Borysław Paulewicz (@boryslaw.bsky.social), 6 Ekim 2023 tarihinde katılan bir Bluesky kullanıcısı. 1.017 takipçisi var, 143 hesabı takip ediyor ve 1.320 post paylaştı.
Sıralama geçmişi
Bu hesabın postlarının Debya günlük listesine girdiği en iyi günler.
Bu hesap henüz günlük sıralamaya girmedi.
Son beğendiği postlar
Bluesky ağındaki herkese açık beğeniler.
A 75-year-old Leamer wrote this in *2019*? Damn... RIP to a legend
Postu gösterJust apologized to my daughter that I had been impatient with her yesterday and she was super sweet and told me that it’s okay, she knows that feeling. Then she went on to complain at great length that her best friends sometimes takes too long on the loo 😭😭😭
Postu gösterEnter the trope about about people hating what they truly are...
Postu gösterPerhaps not, but he was happy to use priors when a sampling interpretation was available, e.g. in gene selection models, and then there's the whole 'fiducial inference' thing, which seems to be a kind of circle-squaring exercise that no knows what to make of.
Postu gösterIt can, but in addition to the inference framework as a decision theory application, not wedged into the middle the way that N-P seems to. On balance, I believe Fisher took the Bayesian side on this one: inference is the statistician's problem but decision is the scientist's problem.
Postu göster
Blokladığı hesaplar
Bluesky’da bloklar herkese açık kayıtlardır.
Bu hesap kimseyi bloklamıyor.