본문으로 건너뛰기

Nate Breznau

@breznaunate.bsky.social did:plc:bqxt3centutml32vhsb2o4ck

Social science. Policy. Open science. Inequality. Meta science. Education. https://sites.google.com/site/nbreznau/ https://crowdid.hypotheses.org @diebonn.bsky.social

Bluesky 가입일

팔로워
2,071
팔로잉
1,255
게시물
670
순위에 오른 일수
0

요약

Nate Breznau(@breznaunate.bsky.social)님은 3 12월 2023에 가입한 Bluesky 사용자입니다. 팔로워 2,071명, 팔로잉 1,255개 계정, 게시물 670개를 보유하고 있습니다.

순위 등장 기록

이 계정의 게시물이 Debya 일일 상위 목록에 오른 최고의 날들.

이 계정은 아직 일일 순위에 오른 적이 없습니다.

최근 좋아요한 게시물

Bluesky 네트워크의 공개 좋아요.

  • J. Nathan Matias@natematias.bsky.social

    “women in social science have long practiced and promoted principles now hailed as innovative, although their contributions are often left out of mainstream narratives”

    게시물 보기
  • Prof. Madeleine Pownall@maddipow.bsky.social

    Thank you for sharing, Nate!

    게시물 보기
  • Netzwerk Nachhaltige Wissenschaft@nnwiss.bsky.social

    Pointierte Zusammenfassung des DFG-Papiers zur Wissenschaftsfreiheit! Must read!

    게시물 보기
  • Katrin Auspurg@kauspurg.bsky.social

    Do researchers share their code upon request? Does running their orginal code on the original data produce the original results? We provide evidence in a new Royal Society Open Science publication. Studying more than 1,000 articles which use data from the European Social Survey, we find that... 🧵

    게시물 보기
  • Sebastian Karcher@adam42smith.bsky.social

    But they weren't estimating the effects of any team-level variables, were they? I think the overfitting critique is probably right, but that's a judgment call. It's not the same as adding a de-facto team dummy when measuring effects at the team level, which I'd consider a clear-cut mistake

    게시물 보기

로그인하여 더 보기

차단한 계정

Bluesky의 차단은 공개 기록입니다.