SkepSci
@skepsci.bsky.social did:plc:wsqnf2gw63prjoga7ps2jrfr
Scientist starting (as we all should) from a skeptical viewpoint
Sur Bluesky depuis le
- Abonnés
- 19
- Abonnements
- 64
- Posts
- 17
- Jours dans les classements
- 0
Résumé
SkepSci (@skepsci.bsky.social) est sur Bluesky depuis le 25 mars 2025. Le compte a 19 abonnés, suit 64 comptes et a publié 17 posts.
Présence dans les classements
Les meilleurs jours où les posts de ce compte sont entrés dans le top quotidien de Debya.
Ce compte n’est encore apparu dans aucun classement quotidien.
Posts aimés récemment
J’aime publics du réseau Bluesky.
It is actually unhelpful to us to have stories that impact us reported without a careful attention to detail — and it is unhelpful to have emotionally charged headlines being used to draw attention to something else.
Voir le postIf your position is that Arday was mistreated by the press, and it’s clear you’ve got a target on The Times, then you should be modeling the editorial standards you’re accusing others of not having. You should be asking experts familiar with those journals about their experiences with those notices.
Voir le postFirst, it’s your paid editorial responsibility to make sure your publications are properly reported, not mine to tag you! It’s troubling that not one person saw the problem here, even as it went into VERY wide circulation. It’s good to see an update but I don’t think this is sufficient.
Voir le postGonna do the deeply unpopular thing and point out that the new Byline Times reporting on Jason Arday is so irresponsible to the point of feeling predatory The headline and opening para make a claim that they subsequently do not back with details, a source, or ANY evidence.
Voir le postMichael Lewis introducing me last night. I would say that I am more obsessed with NIH and its power for good than I am with Director Bhattacharya who does not seem to respect that adequately.
Voir le post
Comptes bloqués
Sur Bluesky, les blocages sont publics.
