Aller au contenu

Cathleen O'Grady

@cathleenogrady.bsky.social did:plc:jzzphuxllummtl6ydgd56db5

Science journo, mainly at @science.org, writing about science & society, research integrity, and other places where the scientific rubber hits the road. cathleenogrady.com

Sur Bluesky depuis le

Abonnés
5 609
Abonnements
865
Posts
43
Jours dans les classements
0

Résumé

Cathleen O'Grady (@cathleenogrady.bsky.social) est sur Bluesky depuis le 10 novembre 2023. Le compte a 5 609 abonnés, suit 865 comptes et a publié 43 posts.

Présence dans les classements

Les meilleurs jours où les posts de ce compte sont entrés dans le top quotidien de Debya.

Ce compte n’est encore apparu dans aucun classement quotidien.

Posts aimés récemment

J’aime publics du réseau Bluesky.

  • Meredith Wadman@meredithwadman.bsky.social

    Don't look now but: Scientific fraud has become an ‘industry,’ alarming analysis finds. Brought to you by @science.org 's excellent @cathleenogrady.bsky.social | Science | AAAS www.science.org/content/arti...

    Voir le post
  • Kathryn Weber-Boer@kowb.bsky.social

    Nice piece from @cathleenogrady.bsky.social and good quote from @ianhussey.mmmdata.io ! It's interesting, though I'm curious about how the code distinguised the use of the p-values... reporting marginal values also has... value 🥁, after all! www.science.org/content/arti...

    Voir le post
  • Martin Enserink@martinenserink.bsky.social

    In the early 2010s, critics started pointing out that much of the psychology literature was unreliable. Now, a statistical analysis suggests the field is improving, @cathleenogrady.bsky.social reports. www.science.org/content/arti...

    Voir le post
  • Ioana A. Cristea@ioanaacristea.bsky.social

    I really love @cathleenogrady.bsky.social work so I read all this and while the Science piece is well-written, 1. For a second I thought we were back ~2015 p-curving the hell out of everything & 2. A ~6% absolute risk reduction doesn’t seem like such an achievement to me considering the investment

    Voir le post
  • Ruben C. Arslan@ruben.the100.ci

    Thanks! I thought you were referring to a published journalistic piece and didn't know what might be wrong in the pieces by @cathleenogrady.bsky.social & @stokel.bsky.social I agree that he's wrong and should correct but it could be an honest mistake, and, like, it's just a tweet? Did you tell him?

    Voir le post

Connectez-vous pour en voir plus

Comptes bloqués

Sur Bluesky, les blocages sont publics.