Don't look now but: Scientific fraud has become an ‘industry,’ alarming analysis finds. Brought to you by @science.org 's excellent @cathleenogrady.bsky.social | Science | AAAS www.science.org/content/arti...

Show Post

Nice piece from @cathleenogrady.bsky.social and good quote from @ianhussey.mmmdata.io ! It's interesting, though I'm curious about how the code distinguised the use of the p-values... reporting marginal values also has... value 🥁, after all! www.science.org/content/arti...

Show Post

In the early 2010s, critics started pointing out that much of the psychology literature was unreliable. Now, a statistical analysis suggests the field is improving, @cathleenogrady.bsky.social reports. www.science.org/content/arti...

Show Post

I really love @cathleenogrady.bsky.social work so I read all this and while the Science piece is well-written, 1. For a second I thought we were back ~2015 p-curving the hell out of everything & 2. A ~6% absolute risk reduction doesn’t seem like such an achievement to me considering the investment

Show Post

Thanks! I thought you were referring to a published journalistic piece and didn't know what might be wrong in the pieces by @cathleenogrady.bsky.social & @stokel.bsky.social I agree that he's wrong and should correct but it could be an honest mistake, and, like, it's just a tweet? Did you tell him?

Show Post