Unsplintering.bsky.social
@unsplintering.bsky.social did:plc:2dsotuep4xvokt44wbiqbjqa
Squints in the age of destruction, scanning for light. What's really going on.
Sur Bluesky depuis le
- Abonnés
- 1 553
- Abonnements
- 1 690
- Posts
- 10 531
- Jours dans les classements
- 0
Résumé
Unsplintering.bsky.social (@unsplintering.bsky.social) est sur Bluesky depuis le 1 février 2024. Le compte a 1 553 abonnés, suit 1 690 comptes et a publié 10 531 posts.
Présence dans les classements
Les meilleurs jours où les posts de ce compte sont entrés dans le top quotidien de Debya.
Ce compte n’est encore apparu dans aucun classement quotidien.
Posts aimés récemment
J’aime publics du réseau Bluesky.
The myth of institutional neutrality: A dangerous climate obstruction strategy By Jennie Stephens journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10....
Voir le postWhy have countries been pushing for a vital global climate report to be delayed? https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2026/oct/20/countries-pushing-vital-global-climate-report-delayed?CMP=Share_AndroidApp_Other #ClimateCrisis #IPCC #Obstruction
Voir le postThis whole thing is pretty misleading, or even outright wrong in some places. No court has ruled as to what constitutes sufficient authorship for AI works. The only ruling that has been made, in the Thaler case, simply held that AI itself can't be an author.
Voir le postThaler had his AI autonomously create a work, and listed that AI as the sole author, stating he had no involvement in the creation, thus no authorship. It's completely irrelevant to the copyright of works authored by human artists using the AI directly. www.bakerdonelson.com/supreme-cour...
Voir le postThis is also wrong. There are many strong legal experts, including Professor Edward Lee that have *very* strong arguments for why the USCO is wrong on this matter.
Voir le post
Comptes bloqués
Sur Bluesky, les blocages sont publics.
Ce compte ne bloque personne.