Unsplintering.bsky.social
@unsplintering.bsky.social did:plc:2dsotuep4xvokt44wbiqbjqa
Squints in the age of destruction, scanning for light. What's really going on.
En Bluesky desde el
- Seguidores
- 1.551
- Siguiendo
- 1.690
- Posts
- 10.531
- Días en rankings
- 0
Resumen
Unsplintering.bsky.social (@unsplintering.bsky.social) es un usuario de Bluesky que se unió el 1 febrero 2024. Tiene 1.551 seguidores, sigue a 1.690 cuentas y ha publicado 10.531 posts.
Apariciones en rankings
Los mejores días en que los posts de esta cuenta entraron en la lista diaria de Debya.
Esta cuenta aún no ha aparecido en un ranking diario.
Posts que le gustaron recientemente
Me gusta públicos de la red Bluesky.
The myth of institutional neutrality: A dangerous climate obstruction strategy By Jennie Stephens journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10....
Ver postWhy have countries been pushing for a vital global climate report to be delayed? https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2026/oct/20/countries-pushing-vital-global-climate-report-delayed?CMP=Share_AndroidApp_Other #ClimateCrisis #IPCC #Obstruction
Ver postThis whole thing is pretty misleading, or even outright wrong in some places. No court has ruled as to what constitutes sufficient authorship for AI works. The only ruling that has been made, in the Thaler case, simply held that AI itself can't be an author.
Ver postThaler had his AI autonomously create a work, and listed that AI as the sole author, stating he had no involvement in the creation, thus no authorship. It's completely irrelevant to the copyright of works authored by human artists using the AI directly. www.bakerdonelson.com/supreme-cour...
Ver postThis is also wrong. There are many strong legal experts, including Professor Edward Lee that have *very* strong arguments for why the USCO is wrong on this matter.
Ver post
Cuentas que bloquea
En Bluesky los bloqueos son registros públicos.
Esta cuenta no bloquea a nadie.