Saltar al contenido

@quisp65.bsky.social did:plc:aiig5eckewsgh6v4dctq7jk6

RN at Sharp (San Diego): Cared for likely early COVID case (onset ~late Dec 2019). Previously healthy 30s pt—ICU, unusual clotting, highly contagious, nearly died. No travel. Hospital reported unknown viral pneumonia early Jan.

En Bluesky desde el

Seguidores
22
Siguiendo
18
Posts
541
Días en rankings
0

Resumen

(@quisp65.bsky.social) es un usuario de Bluesky que se unió el 24 enero 2025. Tiene 22 seguidores, sigue a 18 cuentas y ha publicado 541 posts.

Apariciones en rankings

Los mejores días en que los posts de esta cuenta entraron en la lista diaria de Debya.

Esta cuenta aún no ha aparecido en un ranking diario.

Posts que le gustaron recientemente

Me gusta públicos de la red Bluesky.

  • Adrian Gibbs@gieck.bsky.social

    It would be good if it were true and supported by published evidence that was real, not just repeated rhetoric, and disproved.

    Ver post
  • V P Felmlee@lilhistorian.bsky.social

    I loved these, was always really good at them. Thought it meant I was smart. And then those stupid Rubik cubes came out....

    Ver post
  • Gary Ruskin@garyruskin.bsky.social

    Ralph Baric warned COVID statement could be used for ‘nefarious purposes to shift blame,’ email shows Via @lewiskamb.bsky.social @usrighttoknow.bsky.social usrtk.org/covid-19-ori...

    Ver post
  • David Fisman.@dfisman.bsky.social

    We just published a new study on COVID-19 in Ontario, and it turns out, the way we measured cases may have been way off. Why? Because testing wasn’t equal across age and sex groups. That skews what we think we know. In epi-speak this is called “ascertainment bias”. Here's what we found:

    Ver post
  • Bob’s Your Uncle@bobsyouruncle.bsky.social

    So why does the WHO say this ? www.who.int/news/item/27...

    Ver post

Inicia sesión para ver más

Cuentas que bloquea

En Bluesky los bloqueos son registros públicos.

Esta cuenta no bloquea a nadie.