sirgeefive.bsky.social
👤 Joined on 06 February 2024
Followers
Following
Total Posts
@sirgeefive.bsky.socialokguy.bsky.social
Not Found
crystalsmithsonian.bsky.social
Not Found
Not Found
therealitychecker.bsky.social
sunnyhippies.bsky.social
Not Found
Not Found
os725.bsky.social
xipwad.bsky.social
chriscillizza.bsky.social
Not Found
mattyglesias.bsky.social
Not Found
thekavernacle.bsky.social
harkam.bsky.social
Not Found
gnommunist.bsky.social
bitch we sell drugs we sell ass we do crimes (in minecraft) do what ya gotta just stay alive
Show PostIt was only much later in life that I learned that being the “safe” guy for the parents, uhh, “reduced my desirability” by significant, unrecoverable amounts. :)
Show PostIn any event, I actually answer your four questions similar to how you do yourself. I just think that the *aggreed upon downsides* are not really downsides, when understood properly. It's not a "so what" answer. It's a "no, actually this might be better" answer.
Show Postif people do not like a 200, or 300, or whatever person Supreme Court, supported by 1,000 memeber lower courts, then, perhaps, the judicary could be taught to MIND THEIR OWN BUSINESS and rid us of their unelected supremacy. So, no race to the bottom. Just democracy, *by any means necessary.*
Show PostI think that if the court is going to act like a super-legislature, then it should be *treated* like a super-legislature, and tha means every incoming adminstration *should have to* bring with them the amount of justices necessary to have their agenda upheld. That's just democracy, baby. BUT...
Show Post