jdouglas117.bsky.social
👤 Joined on 12 March 2024
86
Followers
170
Following
175
Total Posts
📜 Kullanıcı Geçmişi
- 12 Mar 2024, 00:22
🎉 Bluesky'e katıldı - İlk kullanıcı adı:
@jdouglas117.bsky.social
🚫 Blokladığı Kullanıcılar
Jane Doe Barbie
ljohn44.bsky.social
ziran
ziranatx.bsky.social
Jim of Pennsyltucky
jimdigs.bsky.social
Yashar Ali 🐘
yasharali.bsky.social
lifeofahunter
lifeofahunter.bsky.social
did:plc:jo6jdesmubbo3ftbuww2kzpj
Not Found
alienjitsu
alienjitsu.bsky.social
did:plc:byjhl7extnzqkj7gus3aio7h
Not Found
Sterling B.
thesterlingone.bsky.social
SweetJimmy (he/him)🇨🇦
sweetjimmy72.bsky.social
did:plc:ttyd3iepxo24awdjowydn7ju
Not Found
Lurk du Soleil
lurkdusoleil.bsky.social
Christopher Webb
cwebbonline.com
floridalaw.bsky.social
𝕕𝕠𝕘𝕤𝕒𝕣𝕖𝕤𝕠𝕔𝕠𝕠𝕝.𝕓𝕤𝕜𝕪.𝕤𝕠𝕔𝕚𝕒𝕝 🪬
dogsaresocool.bsky.social
Lisa
lisa10168868.bsky.social
mrbluesky58
mrbluesky58.bsky.social
Cover 3 NFL 🏈
coversnfl.bsky.social
Dan Walters
profdanwalters.bsky.social
jhalp2.bsky.social
Regulatory Capture
the-devil-you-know.bsky.social
drqui.bsky.social
Fluffy Peanut
fluffypeanut.bsky.social
myobamazon.bsky.social
AnneC
annecw.bsky.social
❤️ Beğendiği Gönderiler
Cut. Cut. Cut. Cut. Cut.
Show Post
Defunding the police is back in style apparently.
Show Post
I like the FT even but this already completely fails on point of logic. What would be *in*discriminate about a very specific 10-digit fortune criterion and tiny demographic exactly? Are tax proposals for much larger demographics now also (logically) vastly more “indiscriminate” according to the FT?
Show Post
The tax math here is also just incorrect.
Show Post