(And of course, as Amanda Anderson notes, peer-reviewed knowledge is already 'viewpoint diverse,' which is why calls to introduce 'viewpoint diversity' don't make any sense on their face, but rather represent an ideological strategy of conservative self-promotion in defiance of empiricism)

Show Post

And thus also a set of predetermined outcomes that must come from the study of these texts - affirmations of a 'classical liberal' tradition that validates free markets, unregulated capitalism, and authoritarian ideas of law as the 'natural' or 'inherent' results of 'fidelity' to the 'tradition'

Show Post

Completely agree with you. I remember doing a college tour of St John's as a senior in high school and thinking it was really interesting, subsequently not going, and then after being taught to read texts contextually in my first year of college thinking that I had made the right decision not to go

Show Post

Which- take it or leave it as a source. But

Show Post

Kapalı içerik

Show Post