Jonathan Led Larsen

jonathanled.eurosky.social

16 July 2026 07:08

To develop it further, IMO the eco-approach needs to merge with other approaches, possibly in a general framework for interdisciplinary cooperation (e.g. as suggested by 'enactive psychiatry'). But a strong identity as an alternative may be an important hindrance for something truly new. 2/2

Adrian Haith

adrianhaith.bsky.social

15 July 2026 20:34

You don’t need really that internal prediction at all. Information about the future state of the ball is already implicit in its current position + velocity. The fwd model computation doesn’t add any new information. Can just skip the prediction step and just use old observations to drive actions.

Andrew D Wilson

adw.bsky.social

15 July 2026 07:16

We ignored the brain for a long time because we needed to do work on the rest of the organism-environment system to see what it was contributing, and what was then left for the brain to contribute. It was on purpose and for good reason. But we ARE getting into it, eg

Andrew D Wilson

adw.bsky.social

15 July 2026 07:09

What is your biggest obstacle to thinking of Gibson's ecological approach as a plausible option? Not necessarily what you disagree with, but what stops you from thinking it gets a seat at the table? (Trying to get a sense of the limiting factor here)

Riccardo Fusaroli

fusaroli.eurosky.social

14 July 2026 11:01

at an international chefs event in italy: me: 二つお願いします jp chef: mo' te lo preparo subito me: må jeg få en af de der? dk chef: pronti per il signore. repeat. my partner rarely had so much fun mocking my linguistic attempts