Protecting the fundamental human rights of the most vulnerable among us is a baseline to restoring our democracy on its path to a “more perfect union,” not a purity test. Plain and simple.

Show Post

So if a candidate said school segregation was ok you'd still support them? Or are you just saying you're cool with suffering because it's trans people

Show Post

Ironic comment, because it represents a child’s understanding of what I am talking about. Pundit-brain nonsense, incapable of viewing anything except through the lens of elections. void of discernment, emptied of any moral sense, curdled value-free cynicism, fuck off, fuck off, fuck off.

Show Post

Anyone who uses the word "purity test" while living under fascism can be roundly ignored. Your way doesn't work. It isn't popular. It doesn't win elections. You just want to do it because you think proper politics must, definitionally, locate a hated minority to sacrifice.

Show Post

If you would try to win by abandoning trans people (or any targeted group) you can save this “we need to win” talk; there is no “we.” I am about solidarity, and you have chosen anti-solidarity. You are not any “we” I recognize. You are the enemy I’m trying to defeat. Beating you is how my “we” wins.

Show Post